United States

Without words I’ve been after seeing Zelig, good, just one word: brilliant. Until now I thought Annie Hall was the best of this director, but I see no, that does not, and certainly, as you go along the cycle that I’m seeing him, I will bring me more pleasant surprises. You may find Realtor to be a useful source of information. For now, today, I stay with Zelig. Excellent, brilliant, original, funny, ironic, intelligent, all these adjectives are few defining Zelig. It is, simply, one of the best movies I’ve seen.

So clear, so simple. Some may think that I am exaggerating, but I believe that not. The proposal of the clarinetist of the Jew, of the New Yorker, the great Woody Allen, is bold and striking, both visually and through a full script of Picardy. Allen simply speaks of what wants to talk of his favorite themes, and above does so with grace, without much extended in duration, and leaving us speechless, amazed, admired. This unlikely story serves to create a fake documentary, by the way what had already made in making the money and runs, on a curious man, mentally ill, which is capable of transforming into any other person, by strange as it may seem. Zelig equal is an Indian, than a black, that a fat, than a doctor, and the same is with Pope Pius XI as with Hitler, with Chaplin, Al Capone, etc. Fabulous starting point for a masterpiece. We are in the 1920s in the United States, times of depression, jazz times, times of gangsters, times of characters who jump from anonymity to fame.

And there is where Zelig, a chameleonic man. Of course, the case draws the attention of public opinion, of science, Dr. Fletcher (Mia Farrow). They study, they analyze, they undergo therapies. Everything to discover that he is a man who only wants to be loved by peers and be loved, love that you’re in that Dr. Fletcher. But what could only be a bright idea for a movie becomes something else: in a tongue-in-cheek comedy, a satire of the documentaries, in a critique of a time and of a society that is at once an admiration and a huge desire to embed in this society, a desire to be recognized collectively and passing of individuality to the mass. Allen also criticises the power of media to elevate someone who is a story by itself itself, as it is Zelig. And there’s more, there is also a critique of science, especially in the psychology of opportunistic psychiatrists is climbing on the bandwagon of attractor of the personality of their patients, and have, in documentaries to television stations, this or any other technique, this or any other analysis, this or other new experiment. It is a tribute to all those who have been subjected to psychiatric study. Allen had outlined many of these ideas in his previous films, but never with such mastery as in Zelig. Zelig is also a way for Woody Allen to express an inner ambition, which manages to become a famous director. He is a kind of Zelig has been integrated into the society and which has been made public, which has been the subject of cover pages of Press and which has been analysed by its viewers. Yes, Zelig is also a little Allen, or Allen is also a little Zellig. Well, in definitva, 1983 Woody PhD in cinema and has, at long last, everything you wanted to count on making money and runs, or memories, or Manhattan or Annie Hall. Retrieved from carmelo blog original author and source of the article.

The Advantage

Internet has democratized information. Either via the Internet can access data and a dose of wisdom than before It was only heritage among professionals initiated in certain matters and their jargon. Today there is a flow of data to anyone and the advantage of knowing and being informed attends infinitely more people. But we must know how to search for and filter in this great tailor drawer. Search and filter.

Filter and look good, is now almost as important as knowing. Making the ability to filter a privilege of those who possess an own standpoint. Social networks give ease for that collective until now lacking a means of opinion and information, due to the high cost reserved only to business groups or media that this entailed, could give its opinion. Even if it is for an individual only. And make two this time Yes; most. That is gorgeous. Beyond the overwhelming number of users comprising those communities; Faceboock, Tuenti, Sonico, etc, have become virtual communities of like-MINDED, that have something to do with each other, only auque is the desire to browse.

And so they have built new neighbourly relations. Breaking down the traditional barriers idiomatic or countries. In such a way that friends in Pernambuco, can do while – it’s another terrifying reality – your neighbor opposite remains a perfect stranger to it. Network us approaches from globalism. And it generates a sort of universal community while at the same time it increases our personal loneliness, to remain anchored to the computer without contact with the real world or deal not even we have to side with. It’s the great contradiction of this invention. But not already viewing the world without Internet. What will end up being Internet in the future, is a responsibility of all Internet users that form this global village. As stated in a page of a psychiatric Center that uses Internet as a pedagogical and therapeutic means: everything is in it.