This definition also is sufficiently ample to illustrate the fact of that the object of the archaeological research is not only the device, so valued material culture of passed societies, and also the human biological remaining portions, animal and vegetal of a context, but it must extend all the same to it the elements of the natural and antrpico environment of cultural context. In fact, we understand that if the material culture if states in and for objects, Archaeology has to see with it. Contanto, is clearly, that the term is understood of sufficiently ample form: it must be moved away from the isolated object or the arbitrary constructions, also englobando (and mainly) the synchronous and specific context of that the collected materials are part. Archaeology unmasks vestiges related to other elements, associations of facts, the same ones that the material culture structure: all object is a precious depositrio and eloquente of relations between the men, as well as all the materials is products and vectors of the action human being, therefore through the material culture it is of the man who treats Archaeology. This if uses of a material documentation that, as physical support of information, has an intrinsically relationary nature. It is who makes to revive the deceased, the property, the material object silenced by the esquecimento and the time, removing it of the blackout under which she lay – of ' ' locus' ' for which he was exile, of the archaeological small farms, of the museums and antiqurios – to make to return it to the originary cradle of the civilization produced that it, and of which he is resulted direct. ' ' The things and homens' ' , in other words, also it could be the program of Archaeology. The material vestiges contain information ' ' virtuais' ' that they only emerge from the formularization of the archaeologist.