You are currently browsing the archives for March, 2012

What To Choose – Montenegro Or Croatia ?

§ March 14th, 2012 § Filed under general § Tagged Comments Off on What To Choose – Montenegro Or Croatia ?

The traditional view is that Montenegro – the direction of a cheap, Croatia – expensive. This is partly true, especially if you compare the cost of products and prices in restaurants: the difference will amount to 10-15 percent in favor of Montenegro. On the side Montenegro and the fact that the currency of this country – the euro, and Croatia in the course of the local kuna, and the exchange rate set by the state. Much easier to transfer the amount of Kuna in rubles, not euros – so prices will be the order of understood immediately. In 2007, a coon was 5 rubles. Average check in the Croatian restaurant – 100-120 kuna (lunch of 2 courses and a glass of wine) at a pizzeria (Montenegrin-Croatian ubiquitous fast food) we can restrict Coon 70-80. In Montenegro, respectively, 10-15 for a restaurant and a pizza for 5-8 -spaghetti. On housing – rental apartments and hotels – the situation is quite the opposite: less expensive rental in Croatia, because there is housing many times more than in Montenegro, while the bulk tourists – thrifty Germans and Dutch.

The choice of accommodation in Croatia is so great that even in August to find a good apartment or house can be 1-2 weeks before travel. In Montenegro, the same, especially in the area of Budva and St. Stephen, all the accommodations (and decent, and not) in August sold out within 2-3 months, with prices often large sum: three bedroom apartments with views of the island of St. Stephen could cost 1100 per week or more. For comparison, in Croatia, a decent rental apartments by the sea with two bedrooms and air-conditioning will cost 800-900 per week. Continuation of the article What to choose – Montenegro or Croatia?

Property Renovation

§ March 8th, 2012 § Filed under general § Tagged Comments Off on Property Renovation

The repair at the moment impossible to imagine without a professional-looking instrument. Indeed, for many procedures just enough to choose the optimal form tools, including the necessary skills to really take concrete progress. The latest construction tools can be divided into two main subgroups – professional and amateur. For home use optimal solution to the problem – it is a universal non-professional construction tools: small tools, electric drills, specific device for tapping on something. Activation of such a tool may well contribute to solve a large number of issues associated with general household repairs and even medium-sized building. In this wide-used in the construction of the instrument can be invoked as masters in the construction of buildings in the same degree and non-professionals.

Moreover, high-quality wide-tool essentially undemanding as to the position of engagement and storage, and besides the economic feasibility. As a versatile tool may require minor amounts of energy to direct activities, and in addition to its conservation is not required special rates. Generalist tool has a much more significant indicators of the quality and range of possibilities, yet this goal is feasible to achieve just the only way – the growth of cost and size. That's why a professional tool in the home often. Just vocational landlord is constantly engaged in repairing and just keeps his instrument at home. Great number of special types of specialized tools have a narrow purpose. Only in this case there is a chance to get really significant effectiveness of tools and a heavy workload work. In this case, virtually all without exception, lay wide-building tool is, and is used for different kinds of tasks.

However, the professionals argued that the universalization always reduces the power of the tool. That is, if you personally are interested in a tool, which can travel great number of different operations, it is best to choose a universal and compact tool. On top of it and much easier to learn. Most importantly – pay attention to quality and not to succumb to an unlicensed low cost.